Oct 20


To me, some gadgets are extremely nice to look at, but useless. I am not talking about the iSleep pillow or the smilies for your bike. Today, I got my eyes on a new iPhone clock docking station. Just look at the image below - isn't it just great? Only that I wonder how many docking stations don't have a clock function, and how many of the iPod Touch and iPhone still need a docking station; probably not too many, but let's leave these questions unanswered for now, especially since I don't have an accurate reply to them, and let's take a closer look at OZAKI's creation, shall we?

The iPhone clock docking station we're talking about is built as a portable wooden case with a mirror-coated casing, and the long(and rather boring) name of this gadget is IP858 iMini Timber 3G iPod/iPhone Speaker. The description given by OZAKI is extremely short, only saying that you can "Play the music and charge your iPhone/iPod touch from docking station Back-lighted LCD display for FM radio and alarm clock." Nothing unexpected there, so let's move on...

... withthe technical specifications of this iPod/iPhone clock docking station, as given by OZAKI:

- 2"x2 full-range speaker driver for peak power 4w~6w
- Just 590g weight(excluded the batteries)<-180x150 Small Rectangle - right->
- Carry it by 110mm Wide, 113mm High, 115mm Deep
- FM Frequency: 88MHz~108MHz
- Packing Szie: W205*H173*D140mm


While the IP858 version is built to work with the iPhone & iPod Touch, the IP835 is an "iPod exclusive," for the remaining iPods - after all, there's more to the iPod than just the Touch, right?

Now, one more thing before we part ways. In fact, there's more just one more thing, since I want to give you the list of functions available with the OZAKI IP858 iPhone clock docking station...

- Play the music and charge your iPhone/iPod touch from docking station
- Back-lighted LCD display for FM radio and alarm clock
- Support for iPhone and all iPod nano/touch with dock connector
- Dual Alarm: wake to iPhone, iPod nano/touch FM or buzzers
- Wooden made sound power and stylish mirror coating casing


That's it for today, folks! I am sure that, if you don't have a docking station yet, you will find OZAKI's creation a tempting offer, although pricing hasn't been announced yet...
These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Mixx
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • TwitThis
Oct 18


Lately, I got myself into a lot of virtual fights regarding the issues had by Apple's iPhone. If you look at those over 200 comments of the iPhone 3G problems article, you'll surely notice that a lot of people have real problems, but here and there pops up some Apple fan saying it's all about the user. I don't have anything against Apple or the iPhone, but one of the latest comments got my attention, and I considered talking about it here. First, take a look at the movie below...

...and now let's see what can be said about it. This is no fake, for sure, so let's take this out of the question, shall we? Now, talking about what could be wrong with the iPhone not working properly... that's a good idea!

I won't get into a longer debate, so I'll only give you my five cents here - it is possible that Apple allowed iPhones with different components to hit the market, so some of the iPhone 3G handsets currently available are less capable then the others. <-125x125 Button - right->I don't know anything certain regarding this, of course, but if we look back at those days when Foxconn ramped up production to about 800,000 iPhones per week, there were some concerns regarding the accuracy of the quality assurance process(this production number was a bit beyond Foxconn's nominal capacity, if I recall it well), and strange things as what's happening in the movie here may be the result of accelerating iPhone production.

Other than the above, I am clueless. If you have any better idea, please enlighten me, but until Roy decides to take apart those two iPhones and check what's inside them, nothing can be sure. I guess he won't do that, anyway, since that would surely void the warranty, but what if, by doing this, he would discover that two iPhones, which are supposed to be the same, are different?
These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Mixx
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • TwitThis
Oct 14


First of all, I have to warn you - this article involves talking about alcohol, so if you're below the legal drinking age, close the page now! Thank you very much! Now, let's get to one of the earthly pleasures I enjoy most - drinking beer. No, I am not an alcoholic, I simply enjoy the finest things in life - beer and heavy metal. And Apple(s), of course! Now, think about Apple, beer, and a lawsuit. Today we'll see how it is possible for these to come together...

Fortunately, this is not a lawsuit against Apple, but since it's about an iPhone app, I couldn't leave them out of this equation. The story goes like this - Coors has to face a $12.5 million lawsuit... for allegedly copying a $3 beer-drinking novelty application, and nothing more! So... what about this program? Well, the $3 app allows its users to drink a pint by tilting their iPhone. Unfortunately, it's only a virtual beer, but it's better than nothing, after all!<-180x150 Small Rectangle - right->

Hottrix, a small and funny company that develops beer and popcorn software tricks for the iPhone, amongst other "software gadgets," decided to file a lawsuit alleging that Coors commited copyright infringement by copying the iBeer app(interesting to see that Apple didn't blow up when seeing the "iBeer" name!). Both Hottrix's application and Coors' iPint display the image of a glass of beer on the iPhone's screen, which is emptied when a user tilts the handset about 90 degrees. Both apps arrived in the App Store on the 11th of July, only that iBeer was priced at $3, while iPint was free.

If you want to have a little bit of fun, you can go ahead and read the 12-page lawsuit. This is still far from being over, since Coors says they yet have to review the lawsuit, but be sure I'll get back to this matter. After all, it's about beer and the iPhone!
These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Mixx
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • TwitThis
Oct 13


When talking about the history of the iPod, gadget freaks usually take you to their trophy room and start telling stories about each of the Apple items there. I know it may sound crazy, but I am sure there are plenty of collectors having the entire iPod line in their secret(or not) storage rooms, and usually using the latest one... or the one that holds the most pleasant memories. Speaking for myself, I only got to know one such guy until now, but his collection was absolutely amazing!

Obviously, after seeing his collection (that was happening a few years ago), I started having dreams. Tech dreams, to be more accurate. No, I am not talking about nightmares... I was simply dreaming about the perfect music player, the one that would combine features from most notorious ones on the market, and a few that I always had in my mind, but never saw in a real device. Anyway, I won't tell you anything else about my perfect media player - one day I may become rich with my ideas, so let's leave all this aside and move to our target - the history of the iPod - shall we?

Until the creation of the iPod, it was the idea, of course. The idea of a small hard drive-based player that was linked with a content delivery system, unlike the bulky flash-memory based players of the late 1990s belonged to Tony Fadell, former General Magic and Philips employee, and now Senior Vice President of the iPod Division at Apple.

Fadell had the idea, but no support to make it reality, so he tried to find a company interested in taking the portable media player concept one step further. RealNetworks and Philips refused, but Apple took the challenge seriously. Looking back, that was a brilliant move for Apple, and a very bad one for the others, especially for Real, caught off guard when the iTunes Music Store was opened...

Once Fadell got inside the Apple camp, Steve Jobs took a very active role in the project, and it took less than a year to finish the first iPod, the beauty you can enjoy in the image above. Now, let's see what was hidden inside that white case, shall we?

The original iPod, announced on October 23, 2001, used 5 GB Toshiba hard drives as large as a quarter, the same ARM processor as the one used in the Newton, an operating system from Pixo, <-336x280 Large Rectangle - right->a large high resolution display(for those days, of course), a lithium polymer battery, and the feature that's going to make it stand out of the crowd most of all - the scroll wheel.

Even more, instead of using skip buttons, like other MP3 players of those days, the iPod allowed its users to navigate through the playlist using the scroll wheel, making this much easier than the competitors from Compaq or Creative.

Despite all the above, the public reacted negatively to the device, despite being shocked by its features, most critics pointing their finger at the $400 price tag and lack of Windows compatibility.

Europe received the iPod one year later with enthusiasm, and it all started to roll - accessories and software products for the iPod slowly appeared, then the 10 GB version of the 1st generation iPod was introduced...

...followed by Apple's decision to make the iPod compatible with Windows through Musicmatch, and the smart move that came as a surprise to many - engraving iPods with text and graphics, just in time to license logos of bands and companies for Apple to create "special" iPods ready for the 2002 Christmas shopping spree. These iPods had Madonna’s, Tony Hawk’s, or Beck’s signature, as well as No Doubt's band logo engraved.

Of course we could talk about iPod engraving, cases and other cool accessories for ages, but let's stick to the history of the iPod, and not the history of iPod accessories, since first complete redesign of the iPod happened in early 2003...

... with the all-touch interface, dock connector, and slimmer case, while on the software side, and the drop of Musicmatch support, which got replaced by iTunes 4.1 for Windows. Capacities ranged between 10 GB and 40 GB, while audio autonomy went down from a previous 10 hours to only 8 hours. Probably the best part about the new version for PC users was the support for USB 2.0, making it much easier for them to connect the Apple iPod, since only a few Windows PCs had FireWire ports back then.

A bit earlier, I mentioned the iTunes Music Store, but it was only in the summer of 2003 when this became reality. Its purpose was obvious - help Apple cut the price of the iPod without feeling it, since the iTunes Music Store started to bring some serious revenue pretty soon.

Since 2003, the iPod got three new generations, but - if you ask me - none of them came up with something really new. Obviously, the screen got bigger, video and picture viewing were added to the feature list, the storage capacity went sky high, with 120 GB models being currently available, and the battery life was improved. As you can imagine, this is something that the competition has done, too, so let's leave the iPod aside and move to the smaller iPod mini!

The iPod Mini was a mid range model that came before the Nano. With only two generations, released in 2004 and 2005, and capacities of 4 GB and 6 GB available, it didn't quite turn the world upside down. In fact, I can say the Mini was a "Beta version" of Nano released to the public, and nothing more.

When we talk about the iPod Nano, things are looking more interesting. In the image that you can see above, the progress made by the design of this gadget from the first to the third generation becomes obvious, and the Nano became instantly a hit, with over a million units sold in the first 3 weeks since its release.

The first generation started at 1 GB in size, and a screen with a resolution of 176 x 132 pixels, and went up to 8 GB and 320X240 when the third generation arrived. While the 4th gen Nano looks great and added an accelerometer for some cool features, the capacities currently available for it range between 4 GB and 16 GB, while the screen size remained the same, as well as the battery life(even shorter than that of the 3G Nano, when talking about video autonomy - 4 hours, instead of 5).

The thing that should not be, the iPod Shuffle, arrived in January 2005, with sizes of 512 MB and 1 GB available, followed by a refresh in 2006, and one in 2008. This is a low end iPod, with poor sound quality when compared to the "serious" iPods, and no display. Apart from being for a while the smallest MP3 player in the world, I don't think this iPod deserves to have a place in the history of the iPod, but here it is, for your viewing enjoyment!

At last, let's talk a little about the "ultimate iPod," the iPod Touch. Basically, the iPod Touch is iPhone's child - you only get the music and video capabilities of the iPhone, without the phone and camera. The iPod Touch runs OS X, comes with 802.11n WiFi capability, and is only a bit smaller than its parent.

Since its release, on the 13th of September, 2007, the iPod Touch got a refresh already, featuring external volume control, an external speaker, a contoured back, as well as built-in Nike+ support. Currently, the first and second generation iPod Touches are both available only in Black, with 8 GB, 16 GB and 32 GB versions. The first generation has a rated battery life of 24 hours for audio, and 7 for video, while the second boosts these values to 36/6. Impressive!

Now, we're done here, but the history of the iPod is far from being over. I know I may have skipped a few minor models, various lawsuits involving iPods, and other less important facts, but be sure of this: we'll get back to the history of the iPod pretty soon, and that's a promise!
These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Mixx
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • TwitThis
Oct 11


You know what? I am tired of hearing so often about cool iPod cases, and ending up with nothing special. Leather or not, pink or black, an iPod case needs a lot for me to consider it "cool." Even more, if I think a little about my generation, who grew up in the 1980s, having a case to remind us our teenage days is the most cool thing I can imagine, and one of the unforgettable memories of those days is the audio cassette...

These days, seeing people listen to audio cassettes is like watching a car from the 1930s on the highway, and I must confess my collection is lying nicely ordered in its place, without being touched for years. Even this way, sometimes I turn to it, grab some music, and play it in my old Panasonic walkman. It would be much easier to play the MP3 or the audio CD, but that would surely kill the feeling.<-180x150 Small Rectangle - right->

The feeling I mentioned earlier could not be brought back by any digital device, but you can get some cool iPod cases to help you remember, because I think the audio cassette should never be forgotten. These being said, let me introduce you the most awesome iPod case I have seen lately - Contexture Design's unique cassette cases!

Unfortunately, we're talking about unique cases, and for now there are only a few left, as you can see here. Being able to hold first- and second-generation iPod nano models, these cool iPod cases are priced at C$45 (≈US$38), with C$4 shipping.

Simply awesome! Just one final thought - I think this is something you could also manufacture by yourself with a little patience and the right tools, if you miss buying one from Contexture. Even more, you'll surely get out much cheaper, and have a lot of fun in the process!
These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Mixx
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • TwitThis
Page 4 of 30« First...«23456»...Last »